When I wrote this several months ago the Trump tax bill had not been written or passed. But, now it is a fait accompli.\u00a0 To my great surprise the Congress wrote a tax bill that rewarded the rich and particularly real estate owners. Instead of removing the depreciation provisions that provided big time tax benefits, which should have been revisited, the Congress actually increased the benefit. So, until the next round don’t worry about that aspect of the Trump effect. However, since Trump’s inauguration more has changed.<\/p>\n
Real estate prices, particular homes, residential properties, industrials\u00a0and office buildings have continued to rise in many markets.\u00a0 This is good news and bad news. The rise in residential prices has hit many economic segments with serious affordability problems. Where this will end up no one really knows but in Cities like San Francisco the working class is literally forced out of the market and will have to live further and further from their employment.\u00a0 At some point business dependent on support staffs will find their pool of potential employees to be far less than needed and will either be forced to raise salaries, provide housing subsidies or move out to lower cost areas where their staff’s can find affordable housing. In Cities like San Francisco,\u00a0 rigid zoning and building codes raise the cost of construction and the lack of building sites is very limited making it difficult to produce affordable housing. This set of problems will hit many cities.<\/p>\n
A danger point is approaching in the retail sector where competition from on-line merchants are eating into once healthy store sales.\u00a0 Many retailers, like department stores (except apparently Macy’s) are struggling and may become dinosaurs. In the major cities traffic and unreliable public transit are inducing people to use on-line purchasing rather than going to the store.\u00a0 This is not good for retail.<\/p>\n
So far, interest rates have not made a material jump but that is probably temporary.\u00a0 If and when interest rates rise there should be downward pressure on values. Further rising costs of doing business in major cities could cause cracks to appear in the rental markets as the number of willing and ready renters diminishes.<\/p>\n
Add to the foregoing the possibility that Donald Trump’s trade policies could prove very disastrous for business in the U S..\u00a0 This could result in lower demand for all types of real estate.\u00a0 Sailing looks smooth but there are many potential bumps on the road. The problem is that when a major bump is hit it will be too late to run for the doors as it was in 2007 with the financial meltdown.<\/p>\n
Commercial real estate prices seem to be inflating and rates of return appear to be at all time lows. Could this suggest that real estate is in a \u201cbubble\u201d?<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n There are two factors circling around that could spell a meltdown in real estate values in the not too far distant future. The first is what might be called the Trump Effect which should lead to an overhaul of the tax laws while the second is the probability that interest rates will rise..<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n THE TRUMP EFFECT: The brouhaha over Trump\u2019s tax returns and the apparent agreement between Trump and Clinton that the tax laws need overhaul are one reason that tax code changes may be in the offing under a new administration.\u00a0 But another reason is the fact that Donald Trump has probably not paid any significant federal income taxes for several years at least.\u00a0 He has gamed the system and bragged about it with statements like \u201cI love depreciation\u201d coupled by remarks of surrogates that the ability to avoid paying taxes shows how \u201csmart\u201d he is. Every real estate professional knows that the tax laws are very favorable to real estate but, until now, the general public did not realize how really favorable they were. Until the campaign induced focus on the Trump tax returns the general public may have thought the tax laws were unfair but now they are convinced of it. This sets the stage for probable, strong public support for a major overhaul of the tax laws to remove that favorability and create a more balanced system. This not to say that Donald Trump did anything that was remotely illegal because he absolutely did not do anything that was against any law.\u00a0 He used the convoluted tax codes to his advantage.\u00a0 That\u2019s all.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Most people without real estate experience don\u2019t realize how the tax codes help \u00a0investment real estate owner and developers.\u00a0 There are many ways but, most importantly the depreciation allowance and the tax deferred exchange provisions are major \u201ctax shelters\u201d.\u00a0 Looking at depreciation first, real estate owners can deduct, from taxable income annually, over the \u201cuseful life\u201d of the building only (land is theoretically not depreciable) an amount that will \u201crecapture\u201d 100% over that \u201cuseful life\u201d.\u00a0 Useful life for commercial buildings is generally codified as 39 years but there are methods for accelerating that recapture. Theoretically, this depreciation schedule simulates the gradual loss in value as a building deteriorates. However, the notion that buildings depreciate in value by 100% over 39 years due to deterioration is just not supported by the facts. The theory completely ignores that, over a 39 year period the odds are that a building will increase in value. Just in case that happens there is a recapture provision in the tax code that claws back any charged depreciation in excess of that actually incurred at the time of sale.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Now the tax deferred exchange comes into play.\u00a0 A property owner can \u201cpostpone\u201d any taxable gain by just exchanging the property for another one of like kind with a greater value.\u00a0 Theoretically, the tax on the gain is deferred until the new property is sold and may be further postponed by another exchange. When the owner dies and leaves the property to heirs the property gets a \u201cstepped up\u201d basis and this avoids any capital gains tax on the asset.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n The foregoing is an over simplification as the tax code is full of twists and turns.\u00a0 For example, property repairs are deductible in the year incurred but if the extent of repair is considered as a renovation for tax purposes, the cost may be required to be \u201ccapitalized\u201d (added to the cost basis and depreciated over time).<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Most people only experience real estate ownership through their homes.\u00a0 Homes may not be depreciated which is one major difference from investment property. Accordingly, depreciation write-offs have not been a popular focus. For the individual homeowner, the only tax benefit is the ability to deduct local real estate taxes (ad valorem taxes) and the ability to deduct mortgage interest (with some limitations).<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n There are transaction structures that greatly improve the ability to shelter income from taxes.\u00a0 And, it can\u2019t be overlooked that investor\/developers only invest a small percentage of the cost of an asset as they borrow the lions share from lenders.\u00a0 Thus, they depreciate the borrowed funds as well. That may be OK because they must repay the loan and pay the lender interest (also deductible) over the life of the loan. <\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n To make tings more complicated there are \u201closs carry forward\u201d provisions in the tax code that permit any loss (like Trumps almost $1 billion) to be carried forward for multiple years, to the extent they are not already charged. There is no basis for assuming that the loss carry forward provisions will remained unchanged in the next round of income tax legislation.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n Years ago, syndicators tied up properties and sold them to investors who became limited partners in the property. Many of these transactions were so cleverly structured that no tax was incurred by the partnership with an excess \u201cwrite off\u201d available to the limited partners to apply to other otherwise taxable income for years to come. Many of these Master Limited Partnerships failed and the investors lost everything plus getting added tax problems. They were sold as \u201ctax shelters\u201d and were not always great investments.<\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n INTEREST RATES:\u00a0 It is not a matter of whether interest rates begin an upward climb.\u00a0 It is only a matter of WHEN. When they do move upwards the spendable income from a property will diminish unless there is a corresponding rise in rents to offset interest cost.\u00a0 However, rents in many urban areas are already at unaffordable and unsustainable levels particularly when one considers the potential cost of doing business add-on of an increase in the minimum wage. <\/strong><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n CONCLUSION:\u00a0 Donald Trump may think he knows more about our tax laws than anyone else and, thus is best equipped to fix them.\u00a0 But, that is an unsubstantiated boast.\u00a0 Real estate could be very vulnerable to a Trump Effect when the tax laws are redone as the overhaul will be designed to close all of the glaring loopholes which can only be a big problem for the very rich. Any material rise in interest rates should be expected to depress real estate values as such will increase the rates of return (capitalization rates) expected by investors unless there is a corresponding increase in rents to offset the effect of higher rates.\u00a0 In many parts of the country, rents appear to be reaching unsustainable levels, particularly in multi-family residential, in view of economic change. Retail rents may come under pressure as retail stores face continuing heavy competition from alternative retailers selling on the internet without the need for a retail store (think Amazon) or big box retailers located outside the CBD (think Costco and Wal Mart). Escalating office rents in central business districts coupled with technological advances via computers may result in causing less need and demand for offices as tele-commuting (working from home via computer) increases. Accordingly, increasing rents is not necessarily something that can be depended on.\u00a0 The bottom line is that there are reasons to worry about the current levels of value and price of investment real estate in the long term future.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" When I wrote this several months ago the Trump tax bill had not been written or passed. But, now it is a fait accompli.\u00a0 To my great surprise the Congress wrote a tax bill that rewarded the rich and particularly … Continue reading